Skip to main content

Full text of "The Fertilization of Flowering Plants"

See other formats


Early Journal Content on JSTOR, Free to Anyone in the World 

This article is one of nearly 500,000 scholarly works digitized and made freely available to everyone in 
the world by JSTOR. 

Known as the Early Journal Content, this set of works include research articles, news, letters, and other 
writings published in more than 200 of the oldest leading academic journals. The works date from the 
mid-seventeenth to the early twentieth centuries. 

We encourage people to read and share the Early Journal Content openly and to tell others that this 
resource exists. People may post this content online or redistribute in any way for non-commercial 

Read more about Early Journal Content at 
journal-content . 

JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary source objects. JSTOR helps people 
discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content through a powerful research and teaching 
platform, and preserves this content for future generations. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit 
organization that also includes Ithaka S+R and Portico. For more information about JSTOR, please 


and respiratory functions, and their curious modes of 
reproduction must be deferred until the next number. 

explanation OF plate 3. Fredericella regina Leicly. 

Kg. 1, 2, and 3. Colonies attached to pieces of bark. 

Pig. i. Magnified view of one Polyzoon. D, brown envelope, the 
ectocyst; E, pellucid wall of the tube and cell, the endocyst; V, 
funiculus ; M, M', M", upper branches of the muscles, the retrac- 
tors ; N, N', muscles of the fold, the retentors ; F, a small infold- 
ing of the endocyst, the brachial collar; G, the pointed ruffle, or 
calyx ; H, the threads, or tentacles. 

Pig. 5. Outline of the interior of part of a young specimen. Same 
letters as above, with the exception of B, „ invaginated fold of 
the tube ; Y, a very young polyzoon, a bud ; K, the throat or oeso- 
phagus ; H", cilia surrounding the mouth ; K'", the valve opening 
into the stomach, oesophageal valve j_ K', stomach ; K"", intestinal 
valve partly open; K", intestine; K, opening of intestine, the 
anus; I, disc, the lophophore; I', the little flap, the epistome; I", 
the mouth ; S, nerve-mass. 

Kg. 6. Side view of the top of a cell, with the tube and crown drawn 
within ; letters same as before with the exception of A"", contracted 
orifice of the cell; L, position of muscular band, the sphincter. 

Pig. 7. View of the same from above. 

Pig. 8. Pront view, showing upper branches of the retractors, which 
are attached to the wall of the tube and to the disc, M" and M'. 



It is now universally accepted by botanists that there 
exist distinct sexes in the vegetable kingdom, and that na- 
ture's method of maintaining the existence of a specific 
form, is to bring the male and female elements in con- 
tact. In a normal flower, the first group of organs we 
find inside the corolla, are the stamens ; while the yellow 
powder, so frequently found inside of the swollen ends 
(anthers) , is the pollen or male element. In the centre 


of the flower we usually find one or more organs, called 
the pistil or pistils. The end or edge of this organ is 
called the stigma, which is generally more or less viscid. 
It is upon this viscid stigma that the pollen falls, or is 
conveyed by insects, the wind, or other agents. Soon a 
small tubule shoots out from the pollen grain ; this tubule 
grows down through the stigma and style, into the ovary, 
where it comes in contact with the unfertilized ovule, 
which is then fertilized, and. becomes capable of develop r 
ing in its cavity an embryo that in time, and under favor- 
able conditions, will become a perfect plant. In by far 
the greater number of flowering plants, we find both the 
male and female element in the same flower, or, in other 
words, such plants arc hermaphrodites. One would nat- 
urally suppose that there could be but one object in thus 
placing the sexual elements in such immediate juxtaposi- 
tion, namely, that each pistil might be fertilized by its own 
pollen or male element. Late researches have, however, 
made it evident that often even among plants, the nup- 
tials cannot be celebrated without the intervention of a 
third party to act as a marriage priest, and that the oiSce 
of this third person is to unite the representatives of dif- 
ferent households. To be specific, seed capsides are- most 
productive when their ovules are fertilized by pollen from 
another plant, or flower of the same plant. " Breeding 
in and in," can by absolute experiment, be proven to pro- 
duce a degenerate offspring in the vegetable kingdom, no 
less than in the event of a marriage between first cousins 
in the human race. 

Now the marriage priests who officiate in the vegetable 
kingdom are insects in search of honey ; the winds, or 
anything which by accident, or design, may carry the 
pollen from one flower to another. How often do we 



hear our agricultural friends complain, that they cannot 
succeed in keeping pure some choice varieties of vege- 
tables, in consequence of the pollen from some common 
stock being wafted or carried to the pure variety, and thus 
contaminating it ? Mr. Darwin has lately proven in the 
case of the genus Linum, or Flax, that though the stigma 
of a flower be completely dusted over with its own pollen, 
not que seed will be matured. This certainly was a "cap- 
ital experiment." Though the impotency of pollen when 
applied to its own stigma is absolute in this case, we may 
not infer the line is always so sharply drawn. Facts con- 
tradict this ; but a great step will have been taken in the 
right direction if we are taught to question many so-called 
instances of close fertilization. For example, most of us 
are familiar with the general habit of our common Laurel 
(Kalmia). We remember, also, that when in bloom, it 
shows us a waving sea of beautiful, rose-colored flowers, 
growing so clogely together as to almost hide the leaves 
from view. When the flower first opens, we may observe 
that there is one small pocket in each angle of the flower, 
and that toward each of these pockets is bent backwards a 
stamen, so that an anther is included in each pocket. 
Every stamen represents a spring just ready to fly to a 
natural position of rest, when let loose. An insect in 
search of nectar lights on the flower, and in so doing jars 
the flower sufficiently to cause the stamen to spring up 
and converge over the stigma. Here, at once we say, the 
design is close fertilization. But not so fast. Pollen is 
often carried by the force of the spring to the pistil of an 
adjacent flower ; and remembering the lesson taught us by 
the flax, we are not sure that pollen of one flower may 
not be prepotent when applied to the stigma of another 
flower, and so completely destroy close fertilization. We 


do not say it is prepotent; any reader of the "Natural- 
ist" may experiment for himself on the Kalmia. It is 
only offered here as a hint. 

The field opened up by Mr. Darwin's experiments is 
new, and alluring, and perchance for that very reason 
may sometimes be so attractive as to lead us beyond the 
limits of sound reasoning, and reliable experiments. Yet 
there exists a group of plants in the study of which we 
may almost feel safe in giving a loose rein to our theories, 
for facts already ascertained, prepare us to believe noth- 
ing can be too strange to be true, in relation to the fertil- 
ization of this group. I allude to the so-called dimorphic 
plants ; where the same species presents two distinct 
forms, one with long stamens and short pistils ; the other 
with short stamens and long pistils. Now it has been 
proven in the case of the Flax, and of the Primrose, that 
the most fertile union is that which results from the im- 
pregnation of the long-styled forms by the pollen of the 
short-styled, and the reverse. Some experiments made 
by myself, at the suggestion of Prof. Asa Gray, convince 
me that the same applies in a remarkable degree to our 
common little Spring Beauty ( Oldenlandia) , or, as it is 
commonly called, Innocence oi\ Bluets.* 

This differentiation of the specific form, may even go 
farther, and give us trimorphic plants. I cannot better il- 
lustrate what I mean, than by quoting at length, though 
at second hand, from Mr. Darwin's paper, "On the Sex- 
ual Relations of the three forms of Lythrum salicaria." 

*In Oldenlandia we find an evident structural differentiation of both 
pollen and stigma. The relative length of the stamens of one form 
when compared with that of the style of the other form, almost drives 
one to the conclusion that the design, in this case, is to secure cross- . 
fertilization. I have frequently observed a species of Thrips crawl- 
ing about from flower to flower, with its back completely dusted over 
with pollen. 


"InLythrum salicarja (Spiked Loosestrife) three plain- 
ly distinct forms occur ; each of these is an hermaphro- 
dite ; each is distinct in its female organs from the other 
two forms ; and each is furnished with two sets of stamens 
or males, differing from each other as much as if they be- 
longed to different species ; and if smaller functional dif- 
ferences are considered, there are five distinct sets of 
males. Two of the three hermaphrodites must co-exist, 
and the pollen be carried by insects reciprocally from one 
to the other, in order that either of the two should be fully 
fertile ; but, unless all three forms co-exist, there will be 
a waste of two sets of stamens, and the organization of the 
species as a whole will be imperfect. On the other hand, 
when all three hermaphrodites co-exist, and the pollen is 
carried from the one to the other, the scheme is perfect ; 
there is no waste of pollen and no false co-adaptation. In 
short, nature has ordained a most complex marriage ar- 
rangement, namely, a triple union between three hermaph- 
rodites, each hermaphrodite being in its female organ quite 
distinct from the other two hermaphrodites, and partially 
distinct in its male organs, and each is furnished with two 
sets of males." 

It farther appears, "that only the longest stamens fully 
fertilize the longest pistils, the middle stamens the middle 
pistil, and the shortest stamens the shortest pistil. And 
now we can comprehend the meaning of the almost exact 
correspondence in length between the pistil of each 
form, and the two half dozen sets of stamens borne by the 
two other* forms ; for the stigma of each form is thus rub- 
bed against that spot of the insect's body, which becomes 
most charged with the proper pollen." 

Mr. Scott has led us to adopt a new clause in our sci- 
entific creed, and one, which, did it not come properly 


vouched for, might well cause a rising doubt. He tells 
us that the pollen of one species of Passion Flower will 
fertilize the ovules of another species, though the ovules 
of the first may not in turn be fertilized by the pollen of 
the second. Thus Tacsonia mollissima will fertilize the 
ovules of Passiflora racemosa, but Passiflora will not fer- 
tilize Tacsonia. 

Interesting as may be the means resorted to in the ca- 
ses above mentioned, to secure cross-fertilization (mostly 
through the medium of insects) they yield in fascination 
to the adaptations by which the same results are accom- 
plished by the same agents in many Orchids. 

We must refer those who wish to go into the details 
of fertilization, as it is brought about in this gorgeous 
family, to Mr. Darwin's interesting volume on "Fertili- 
zation of Orchids by Insects." They will there find the 
subject treated of by a master mind in such inquiries. 
The temptation to meddle in work so much better done 
elsewhere, is too great, and we should be surprised at 
ourselves if we passed the subject entirely by. Among 
the Orchids and Milkweeds (Asclepias) , we find that the 
pollen, in place of being loose, or at the most slightly 
coherent, is here neatly done up in two' small decanter- 
shaped packets, which are connected at the top of the 
necks by a small, viscid gland. 

Let us imagine that on some bright summer morning, a 
humble bee, for example, happening to be out in search 
of the material from which to get its store of honey, 
alights on one of these Orchids. Standing, perchance, 
on the large lip (so prominent among these flowers), it 
dips its head down to the bottom of the flower in search 
of nectar. The chances are ten to one that its forehead 
strikes directly upon this viscid gland connecting the two 


packets of pollen. By the time the nectar is exhausted 
the gland has become adherent to the bee's head, and as 
it (the head) is withdrawn, the two pollen masses are 
extracted from their pockets, and now stand off in front 
like a pair of horns. The bee, most likely, flies to another 
plant of the same species, or still more probably to another 
flower of the same plant. Suppose the stigmatic surface of 
this species of plant be broad, or possibly separated almost 
into two parts ; we will find the packets have slowly but 
surely diverged so as to be the exact width of that surface. 
Suppose on the other hand, the stigma be a narrow one, 
we shall find that the packets have come close together. 
In either case when the bee's head bobs down into the 
next flower, it will almost certainly happen that these 
same pollen masses will be left sticking on the stigma 
when the bee leaves, or at least part of the pollen will be 
left. These masses of pollen have long since been 
frequently observed on the bee's head, but, until quite 
lately, no meainng had been attached to it. Some ento- 
mologists, I believe,' have even been guilty of describing 
these as natural appendages to the bee's head. So mani- 
fest are these adaptations for the purpose of cross fertil- 
ization among Orchids, that we may be well nigh sure 
some great purpose is to be subserved. Perhaps it would 
not be too much to say, that but for insect agency many 
Orchids would become extinct. There are not wanting 
those who even affirm the insect shape assumed by some 
Orchidaceous flowers, has no less purpose than to serve as 
a decoy, and thus tempt the bee or butterfly to alight 
upon them and accomplish the work of fertilization. Those 
wishing to be apprized of the mode of fertilization, as it 
occurs in our American plants, will find some admirable arti- 
cles from the pen of Prof. Asa Gray, in Silliman's Journal 


for 1862. Kobert Brown long since called attention to 
insect agency, in the fertilization of the Milkweed family. 
Almost any summer day we may repeat his observations 
for ourselves. So adhesive are the glands of the Ascle- 
pias obtusifolia (Wavey-leaved Milkweed) , that we often 
find honey bees unable either to withdraw the packets, or 
loose their feet from the gland, and thus they become 
prisoners for life. 

There exists yet another class of dimorphic flowers, in 
which we find the large and more conspicuous flowers less 
fertile than those of the other form, which are arrested in 
their development, and are fertilized in the bud. Hugo 
van Mohl has of late called especial attention to them. 
Such flowers have been happily termed precociously fer- 
tilized. Mohl concludes, after close examination of Viola, 
Oxalis, Specularia and Impatiens, that nature is here 
specially solicitous to secure close breeding, or that each 
flower shall be fertilized by its own pollen. He calls 
attention also to the fact, that in the large anthers of the 
smaller form of Oxalis acetosella, not more than two 
dozen pollen grains are found, while in the anthers of the 
larger form they are much more numerous. In the smaller 
form, however, the few grains are made more potent, 
and the exercise of their function is secured, by being 
placed in contact with the stigma. It results, however, 
that our list of closely fertilized plants is becoming smal- 
ler, under the repeated observations of accurate investiga- 
tors, and that, what was supposed to be a special adapta- 
tion to secure close fertilization, is, after all, but a more 
nicely conceived method of obtaining an opposite result. 
For example, we were formerly taught that the interior 
petals of Corydalis clasped the anthers and stigma of the 
flower in so tisrht an embrace that outside fertilization 


was a thing not to be thought of. Dr. Hildebrand in- 
forms us however, that though the stigma of Corydalis 
cava be completely dusted over with pollen from the same 
flower, yet no seed will set if insects be excluded from 
carrying pollen from flower to flower. This fact is, as 
will be observed, another illustration of Mr. Darwin's law 
of prepotency of pollen taken from one flower, and applied 
to another. Professor Gray also calls attention to the 
"effectual activity of so large an insect as the bumble-bee 
in fertilizing our Corydalis aurea" (Golden Corydalis) . 

Just now we can point to but one instance in which a 
plant of high order is found to produce perfect embryos, 
without the ovules having been previously fertilized ac- 
cording to the known method. In the Kew Gardens, 
near London, has been kept for many years a plant of the 
Spurge family, which furnishes this one example. Dr. 
Hooker writes to Humboldt concerning it, as follows : 
"Our Ccelebogyne still flowers with my father at Kew, as 
well as in the Garden of the Horticultural Society. It 
ripens its seeds regularly. I have repeatedly examined 
it with care, but have never been able to discover a pene- 
tration of pollen utricles into the stigma, nor any traces 
of their presence in the latter or in the style." This plant 
belongs to the old Linnsean class Dioecia. It is unisexual, 
and as there exists only (so far as known) the female 
plant in England, it is difficult to conceive how the fertil- 
ization is accomplished, unless through the agency of 
concealed anthers. Though diligent search has been made 
time and again for the anthers, they do not seem to have 
been found. "We may still fairly hesitate before accepting 
this as an example of parthenogenesis, or virgin fertility.